![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
*laughs arse off*
Oh god, you've GOT to be kidding me -- and no, I'm not locking this, because this, on top of having 1. been at work on a Saturday and 2. having shite customers, apart from the last one, who was oh so very sweet this piece of feedback just made me howl with laughter. Since the person didn't give out his/her real email addy, I think it's safe to say he/she is a troll. If not? Then they deserve you guys having a laugh at their expenses as well.
from: fake-email-address@hotmail.com
I liked part 1 but I didn't read part 2 - stopped as soon as I realized Jack was in the submissive role. To me a submissive Jack is a bottom Jack and I just can not believe a Jack written in that role. I do not enjoy reading such either so I have stopped reading those stories period.
It is a matter of personal taste and not a reflection on your writing. However, as a reader I would appreciate being warned so that I do not get involved in a story only to be sorely disappointed.
That last line? FTW!
I'm not even sure I remember all that much about that story (invisible ties), it was a fb sent via Area 52, so it's a VERY old story. Ah, archived in 2004. My memory is not that good XD
Seriously, if we are to warn about EVERYTHING, the header of a fic would be bigger than the stories themselves...
eta: We're talking about Jack O'Neill here, not Jack Harkness, who we all know doesn't care about about top or bottoming or really, stupid 21st century labels *g*
from: fake-email-address@hotmail.com
I liked part 1 but I didn't read part 2 - stopped as soon as I realized Jack was in the submissive role. To me a submissive Jack is a bottom Jack and I just can not believe a Jack written in that role. I do not enjoy reading such either so I have stopped reading those stories period.
It is a matter of personal taste and not a reflection on your writing. However, as a reader I would appreciate being warned so that I do not get involved in a story only to be sorely disappointed.
That last line? FTW!
I'm not even sure I remember all that much about that story (invisible ties), it was a fb sent via Area 52, so it's a VERY old story. Ah, archived in 2004. My memory is not that good XD
Seriously, if we are to warn about EVERYTHING, the header of a fic would be bigger than the stories themselves...
eta: We're talking about Jack O'Neill here, not Jack Harkness, who we all know doesn't care about about top or bottoming or really, stupid 21st century labels *g*
no subject
Not to mention solely defining a character by what sexual positions they might enjoy, particularly when you try and use those preferences to stick them into unrealistic and subjective roles in relationships.
Because people really are two dimensional paper cut outs.
::head desk::
no subject
no subject
no subject
Exactly. I think by now we should warn like this: "Please note that after this header with its warnings, is a pice of FIC-TION" *g*
no subject
Kthanx
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Oh, I know! Warning: Daniel breaks his glasses XD
Read at your own risk (a.k.a. be responsible for your own actions)
BTW...
Re: BTW...
Well, it's Stargate fic, so I don't know if it's to your interest, but it's a sequel to A Night to Remember (http://ximeria.popullus.net/fanfic/sg-night.php) - sequel: Invisible Ties (http://ximeria.popullus.net/fanfic/sg-night.php)
no subject
Title: some story
Pairing: Jack/some dude
Warnings: NC-17 contains m/m sex in which Jack ****up the****, also features Jack ********ing *****(twice) and using ********. The other dude prefers ********* but is eventually persuaded to ******* up the *********also, and realises that he really likes *************. Oh, and also includes thumbs, just in case [Bad username or site: nicci mac @ livejournal.com] is reading.
no subject
no subject
I have a bad user name.
YAY!
no subject
no subject
and yes, Nicci IS a bad username XD
no subject
no subject
Here I am
High on cleaning products!
no subject
no subject
Well, we're talking big bad Jack O'Neill here. Seriously, I used to love writing Jack trusting a partner enough to just let go *g* -- so plenty of my age old SG1 fic leans in that direction XD
no subject
'
Maybe this person would like warnings for published fiction too. *Rolls Eyes*
Hamlet: Everyone dies
no subject
Exactly
no subject
Warning: Swearing, violence, boy kissing, boy/girl kissing, girl/girl kissing, repeated character death, regular character death, m/m sex, f/f sex, m/f sex... just to name a few.
People seem to think they're entitled to warnings for EVERYTHING when it comes to fanfic.
no subject
Well, I laughed my head off. Then I realised they meant Jack O'Neil and all I could think was: yet another reader that feels more comfortable feminising Daniel. Mind you, I also thought that it's a shame fic does tend to veer towards penetrative sex in writing, rather than frotting or oral. If there was less emphasis on penetrative sex maybe we could finally get away from narrow little boundaries such as who tops or who bottoms. That said, I do see Daniel as a bottom. Not because he's more vulnerable - because he is the ultimate survivor in many ways - but because he's pushy *g*
no subject
slutplayer in the universe *g*I never really label anyone bottom or top. At least, I don't base it on who pentrates vs is penetrated. I love writing everything from blowjobs to full scale penetration, including frottage. I tend to view Daniel a competent instigater or a very pushy participent LOL
no subject
I have to admit that when I first started writing and archiving my stories, I was appalled by the Bottom!Jack warning that you were supposed to post at Area 52 if your story contained such a scandalous thing. In fact I was so appalled that I never used to use it - it made me so fucking mad! I mean WHAT THE FUCK? Why was there no Bottom!Daniel warning, only one for Jack? I tell you, I used to spit blood over that. Talk about a widely held fandom belief that becomes fucking LAW! Grrrrrrrrrrrr! Daniel was bottom and that was it, apparently. Utter bollocks!
Shame he/she didn't have the balls to back up their whining with a real address.
Also a shame that Area 52 haven't abolished such a ridiculous and insulting warning.
/rant.
*goes and has one of the nice yellow pills and a lie down*
no subject
no subject
But I'm pretty sure that it was to keep any hint of Jack being the kind of guy that caught instead of pitched from the eyes of tenderhearted readers, as Xim's feedback suggests. *grits teeth*
*rattles pill bottle*
no subject
Were they watching the same show I was? Cause no matter how much macho, air-force bluster our Jack musters up, Caving in to Daniel (with a roll of the eyes no less) seems like it's always been his natural state.
This is like the bagged wood I get for fires that clearly states..."remove wood from (plastic) bag before lighting fire" (lol)... this *is* slash - and fanfic - seriously, how many warnings does it really need? The only time I wanna be warned is if it's reaally gross, non-con (cause that's just a whole different vibe) or character death. (okay, maybe interpspecies sex should come with a warning *g* "no unas were compromised during the writing of this fic")
Can we campaign for a "SimperingWuss!Daniel" warning - cause those really leave me sorely disappointed (Jack, too I imagine)
no subject
i kind of want to try that email address though
no subject
no subject
Jack doesn't bottom. Oh no. Of course he doesn't. Never.
ROTFLM(o)(o)A(_|_)O!!!!!!!!!!!!!